Comparative analysis of project management techniques

AuthorSunthorn Thitayarak
Call NumberAIT SSPR no.108
Subject(s)Industrial project management
NoteA special study submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of Master of Engineering of the Asian Institute of Technology, Bangkok, Thailand
PublisherAsian Institute of Technology
AbstractIn this study the traditional techniques and network techniques for project management are featured in some details. The traditional techniques (Gantt Chart, Milestone Method, Line of balance) have many limitations which can be overcome by the application of network techniques (e.g. CPM, PERT, GERT). The models of these techniques can be represented by two system; Activity on Arrow and Activity on Node (precedence diagram). The first development of CPM and PERT based on Activity on Arrow system which permits much less computer storage than Activity on Node system but it requires complied dummies while the other does not. CPM(Critical Path Method} is deterministic motel; it is mostly used in construction industry. PERT (Program Evaluation and Review Technique) is a probabilistic one used mainly in research & development project. The two models were developed independently but in actual practice some of their differences have disappeared or at least become less important. The further development of CPM and PERT is called GERT (Graphical Evaluation and Review Technique) which is a stochastic network. It is a powerful technique that can overcome the limitations of CPM and PERT.
Year1975
TypeSpecial Study Project Report (SSPR)
SchoolStudent Research Before 1980
DepartmentOther Field of Studies (No Department)
Academic Program/FoSAIT SSPR (Year <=1978)
Chairperson(s)Pakorn Adulbhan
Examination Committee(s)Sharif, M. N. ;Techapun Raengkhum
Scholarship Donor(s)Royal Thai Air Force
DegreeSpecial Studies Project Report (M. Eng.) - Asian Institute of Technology, 1975


Usage Metrics
View Detail19
Read PDF0
Download PDF0